Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
My most challenging political / civic fight I've taken on because of my unshakable sense of moral obligation to act, also happens to be the one which I am most proud of to this day.
I have no regrets for standing up and staring down a major corporation, used to getting their way, equipped with a fully staffed powerhouse communications team, and forcing the bright light of public scrutiny on their immoral plot to tear down a whole block of low-income housing before anyone knew what happened.
What made things even more challenging, was that I had developed close personal and professional relationships with members of that organization and their communication team, and a failure on my part in this endeavor, could have proven catastrophic. But it was a risk I was willing to take because I knew no one else was going to, so I had to.
And in the end, I managed to do what many people told me couldn't be done.
Back in March of 2016, I was presiding over a regular meeting of the Powell-Poage-Hamilton Neighborhood Association, of which I was Co-Chairman. It was a typically low-key meeting, until the closing minutes when a regular attendee of our meetings let something slip.
This individual was an experienced communications staffer for the region's largest employer, Gundersen Health System, a major medical institution, whose main campus overlapped with our neighborhood of mostly low-income and a few middle-class residents.
Just as the meeting was about to end, he revealed that Gundersen Health System was going to demolish an entire block of neighborhood housing to replace it with a surface parking lot.
That sort of action - of tearing down housing in favor of surface parking lots - was an unimpeded common practice of that medical institution for decades. However, our neighborhood association had recently collaborated with that Gundersen, as well as the municipal government, a top-tier planning firm, and many other key stakeholders, to develop a comprehensive joint neighborhood-campus plan (which cost local taxpayers roughly a quarter of a million dollars), in order to begin a new era of shared prosperity and cooperation between our neighborhood and Gundersen.
Importantly, one of the most critical elements of our new relationship was an end to the sort of surprise actions like the one we had just learned about and which ran completely counter to the exhaustive planning document we had recently agreed upon and had been working hand-in-glove to execute collaboratively for well over a year by then. In fact, just months prior to this egregious betrayal, I had even joined the same external affairs staff who I was about to spar with, along with our city's mayor, and the planning team we worked with - Perkins+Will, on a trip to a national conference to promote our recent planning initiative and newfound relationship as a new industry model. (See photo below)
When it was revealed that our neighborhood was about to lose a block of housing for a barren surface parking lot, I began with some pointed questions. Unfortunately, that went nowhere, and our association was told, in the closing minutes of the meeting, that there was nothing that could be done by that point.
But that wasn't the case. And as the only one in the room with a degree in Public Administration, I knew it — which meant that the responsibility to act fell on me particularly hard.
See, I knew they still needed approval from the City Plan Commission, as well as the Judiciary and Administration Committee, and a final approval from the full Common Council. I also knew how to use that process to pump the brakes on things like this. Perhaps most importantly, I had developed great relationships with the various players in that process. Meaning, not only did I know what to do and who to work with, I knew what to say and what not to say as well.
So, after the meeting was adjourned, and after the communications team for the medical juggernaut tried their best to calm my concerns and the concerns that the rest of the residents were beginning to feel, this is where I began to employ every communications and relationship management skill and intuition I had.
The first step was to get the full Executive Board of our neighborhood association on the same page about what to do next. That proved harder than it should have though, because one of our board members - who was also a member of the City Council - was unable to attend our emergency executive meeting, and worse still, my Co-Chair was a doctor at that very medical institution, and her husband was the fourth member of our association's Executive Board - so both had a financial stake in this fight which put them in a very awkward position, and neither of them was involved in developing the neighborhood-campus plan, as I was, or had a background in urban planning or public administration, as I did.
But after much deliberation, I eventually persuaded them to differ the management of this issue to me.
And days later, I was making my case to the City Plan Commission that they deny the corporation's request, and I made sure the press was there to get the story - knowing all the while, that there was no chance that I would be able to persuade such a large corporation to change course when they had already invested so much to get to that point already... at least not through personal persuasion - I simply didn't have enough personal leverage. I tried persuading them to compromise in private by that point already, but they wouldn't budge. I knew that my only shot was to try this in the Court of Public Opinion and turn the tables. That was the leverage I had available to me if I was willing to go and grab it.
And even though I understood all the risks involved, I saw the leverage available to me, and I went for it. I got the first series of stories written - with the clear strategic intent of shining the brightest possible spotlight on the issue, putting the powerful corporation on defense and carefully controlling the narrative every step of the way.
That's just what happened. The stories were written, and all followed the same narrative:
'Overzealous and all-powerful corporation is going back to its old ways of bulldozing housing for low-income people for their own short-term gain in a fragile neighborhood that has been doing its best to revitalize itself...'
At that City Plan Commission meeting, my strategy began to pay off.
The City's Planning Department publicly stated their opposition to the effort to raze nine houses for a parking lot, and the City's Planning Commission heard my pleas for the opportunity to gather more neighborhood input and work out a compromise with the medical institution, and subsequently recommended the request for the permit be referred for 30 days - and in so doing, they were handing me and our neighborhood association the golden gift of time; time to reason and find common ground with the major employer in the backyard of our neighborhood, and precious time to keep the heat on.
And right on cue, the stories began to roll in...
However, the next City committee in the approval process threw me a giant curveball.
Despite the recommendations of the City's Plan Commission and outright opposition by the City Planning staff, the City's Judiciary and Administration Committee made the uncommon choice to break with the Planning Committee and supersede their recommendation for referral and instead chose to send the demo permit straight to the City Council for a vote.
It was then that my lobbying efforts, organizing skills, strategic planning chops, and media prowess, all went into hyper-drive. The first order of business was to start vote-counting, by checking in with each member of the City Council to determine if they were planning to vote for or against the permit.
I soon realized that I needed to turn up the heat on the Council, most of whom were sympathetic to my position on this issue, but who also had to weigh the very real concerns of aggravating such a hugely influential organization like the one I was up against and asking them to join me in standing up to.
So, I made some calls and worked with a few local activists to create more press.
(See highlighted news coverage below)
But I knew that heat and pressure alone wasn't going to be enough to get the Council to retreat from their usual posture of kowtowing to this institution. I needed to give them cover and reason to delay the action - knowing full well that I was winning now because as the political-truism goes...
"If you're explaining, you're losing."
I knew that the longer I could keep the corporation feeling the need to explain themselves, the less likely they were to get what they wanted in the end.
So, I teamed up with a faculty member from the local university to survey all the available parking spaces that the corporation had available - something I firmly believed the medical institution should have done already if they were truly doing their due diligence on this matter. Once our analysis was done, I formed a document that presented our findings, along with numerous options for parking and facility reconfiguration, and other options for a compromise that I was willing to make on behalf of the neighborhood. Finally, I presented those findings and alternatives to the Mayor and members of the Council - feeling still that the odds were stacked against me and that my most likely net-positive outcome would be for compromise to be found.
(See offered compromise below)
But I knew that heat and pressure alone wasn't going to be enough to get the Council to retreat from their usual posture of kowtowing to this institution. I needed to give them cover and reason to delay the action - knowing full well that I was winning now because as the political-truism goes...
"If you're explaining, you're losing."
I knew that the longer I could keep the corporation feeling the need to explain themselves, the less likely they were to get what they wanted in the end.
So, I teamed up with a faculty member from the local university to survey all the available parking spaces that the corporation had available - something I firmly believed the medical institution should have done already if they were truly doing their due diligence on this matter. Once our analysis was done, I formed a document that presented our findings, along with numerous options for parking and facility reconfiguration, and other options for a compromise that I was willing to make on behalf of the neighborhood. Finally, I presented those findings and alternatives to the Mayor and members of the Council - feeling still that the odds were stacked against me and that my most likely net-positive outcome would be for compromise to be found.
(See offered compromise below)
When the local news station said that the medical institution was declining to comment further, I knew my timing and position were darn-near perfect heading into the vote.
Then the night of the vote finally came, and the Council made the rare decision to open the meeting up for public comment.
I was given 15-minutes. The external affairs team for the medical institution was given 15-minutes as well.
And after much deliberation amongst the Council, not only did I manage to see my long-held objective of attaining an amenable compromise solution become a reality, the leading voice on the other side bought me a drink afterward.
The next few days brought more news coverage that seemed like a complete impossibility to many at the outset of the whole ordeal - back when the medical institution said they would not budge an inch and when many community leaders told me I was crazy for taking on this fight.
(See news stories below)
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.